Sri Surapaneni, Period 1

Assignment Points Grade Evidence
Pull Request (Integration) 2 1.1 Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 10 22 10 AM Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 11 25 13 AM (Didn’t pull request day before unfortunately, but had pull requested a lot after, grade could be updated)
Relevancy Checklist (Peer) 2 1.71 Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 4 30 13 PM 7.1 7.2 <- Comments are on bottom, average for 7.1 and 7.2 is 77
Lesson (Group) 1 0.91 (Mr. Mortensen said we got a .91 after our teach, didn’t put in synergy yet)
Homework, Popcorn Hacks 1 x 8 7.32 LinktoHWs … 0.95 + 0.92 + 0.88 + 0.91 / 4 = 91.5
Individual Contribution 1 0.9 Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 5 29 52 PM Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 5 34 15 PM————————————————————————————-> 7.1, 7.2, Repo of Team Teach <- (Created entire 7.1 and half of 7.2, intro, aidan was scrum master so he did all pull requests while i committed on main)
Personal Notebooks / Blogs 1 0.9 Review Blog
Total 12 adds up to 12.84 (total should be out of 13 probably)  

. . . . . . . . . .

Skill Points Grade Evidence
Work Habits (Analytics) 1 0.9 Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 5 53 30 PM
Team Planning (Issue) 1 0.89 Link
Presentation Memories 1 0.88 People laughed at our memes, we helped Sharon with a problem, Aidan had a good card sort demonstration, and I got to explain the venn diagram and let them compare/contrast
Grading and Feedback 1 0.89 Link
Beyond Perfunctory 1 0.88 Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 6 01 59 PM Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 6 02 32 PM
Total 5 4.44  

. . . . . .

Combined Review of Peer Graders

Assignment Weightage Grade (Review 1) Grade (Review 2) Average Grade
College Board Coverage 20 18 17.5 17.75
Java Examples 30 28 27 27.5
Popcorn Hack Usage 10 8 8.5 8.25
Homework 10 7 8 7.5
Grading Plan 10 8 9 8.5
Original and Creative 10 7 9 8
Total 90 76 79 77.5

Summary of Comments:

  • College Board Coverage: Both reviews indicate solid coverage of College Board content, though it could have gone more in-depth to exceed expectations.
  • Java Examples: Strong examples provided, clear and easy to understand. Reviewers noted that the examples were specific to each bullet point and very effective for teaching.
  • Popcorn Hack Usage: The hacks were well implemented, with both reviews appreciating their inclusion. However, reviewers felt that they could have been more complex or creative.
  • Homework: Covered the necessary topics, with one reviewer suggesting that it could have been more detailed for better engagement.
  • Grading Plan: Clear grading structure based on participation and completion of homework and popcorn hacks. It was fair and well communicated.
  • Original and Creative: While one review mentioned minimal creativity (a few images and a joke), the other praised the creative use of memes and organization, which helped maintain student focus.